[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#193401: marked as done (specific dependency on libc6)



Your message dated Thu, 15 May 2003 22:32:47 +0200
with message-id <16067.63855.669349.854109@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Bug#193401: specific dependency on libc6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2003 09:43:45 +0000
>From rmh@khazad.dyndns.org Thu May 15 04:43:44 2003
Return-path: <rmh@khazad.dyndns.org>
Received: from 80-24-13-86.uc.nombres.ttd.es (khazad.dyndns.org) [80.24.13.86] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 19GFH4-0005TU-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 04:43:42 -0500
Received: from aragorn ([192.168.0.3])
	by khazad.dyndns.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19GHfc-0002fP-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 14:17:12 +0200
Received: from rmh by aragorn with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 19GFGN-0000Fl-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 11:42:59 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: specific dependency on libc6
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 11:42:59 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] E19GFGN-0000Fl-00@aragorn>
Sender: Robert Millan <rmh@khazad.dyndns.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.3 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF
	autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libstdc++5-dev
Version: 1:3.2.3-2
Severity: important
Tags: sid patch

libstdc++5-dev depends specificaly on libc6, making it uninstallable
on arches that have other soname versions, including alpha, ia64,
i386-gnu, *-freebsd-gnu, *-netbsd

I have set severity to important (instead of serious) because i'm not
sure if release arches alpha and ia64 provide libc6 in their libc6.1
package.

This patch fixes all them:

diff -ur gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9.old/debian/control gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9/debian/control
--- gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9.old/debian/control 2003-05-15 11:26:32.000000000 +0200
+++ gcc-3.2-3.2.3ds9/debian/control     2003-05-15 11:37:37.000000000 +0200
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@
 Architecture: any
 Section: libdevel
 Priority: standard
-Depends: gcc-3.2-base, libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.2.3-2), libc6-dev (>= 2.2.5-8), g++-3.2 (>= 1:3.2.3-2)
+Depends: gcc-3.2-base, libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.2.3-2), libc6-dev (>= 2.2.5-8) | libc6.1-dev (>= 2.2.5-8) | libc0.3-dev (>= 2.2.5-8) | libc1-dev | libc12-dev, g++-3.2 (>= 1:3.2.3-2)
 Conflicts: libg++27-dev, libg++272-dev (<< 2.7.2.8-1), libstdc++2.8-dev, libg++2.8-dev, libstdc++2.9-dev, libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1-dev, libstdc++2.10-dev (<< 1:2.95.3-2), libstdc++3.0-dev
 Suggests: libstdc++5-doc, stl-manual
 Provides: libstdc++-dev

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux aragorn 2.2.22 #1 dl nov 25 21:59:43 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=ca_ES.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.ISO-8859-1

Versions of packages libstdc++5-dev depends on:
ii  g++-3.2                      1:3.2.3-2   The GNU C++ compiler
ii  gcc-3.2-base                 1:3.2.3-2   The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  libc6-dev                    2.3.1-17    GNU C Library: Development Librari
ii  libstdc++5                   1:3.3-0pre9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 193401-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 May 2003 20:36:50 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Thu May 15 15:36:49 2003
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 19GPT6-0006S1-00; Thu, 15 May 2003 15:36:48 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (daemon@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA08686;
	Thu, 15 May 2003 22:32:48 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
	by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id h4FKWlQ15554;
	Thu, 15 May 2003 22:32:47 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16067.63855.669349.854109@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 22:32:47 +0200
To: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org>, 193401-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#193401: specific dependency on libc6
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E19GFGN-0000Fl-00@aragorn>
References: <[🔎] E19GFGN-0000Fl-00@aragorn>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: 193401-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-25.7 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_30,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
	      REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_VM
	autolearn=ham version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Robert Millan writes:
> Package: libstdc++5-dev
> Version: 1:3.2.3-2
> Severity: important
> Tags: sid patch
> 
> libstdc++5-dev depends specificaly on libc6, making it uninstallable
> on arches that have other soname versions, including alpha, ia64,
> i386-gnu, *-freebsd-gnu, *-netbsd
> 
> I have set severity to important (instead of serious) because i'm not
> sure if release arches alpha and ia64 provide libc6 in their libc6.1
> package.
> 
> This patch fixes all them:

there is nothing to fix. the generated debian/control already takes
care of this.



Reply to: