Bug#193049: g++-3.3: inlining failure for allocate in ~vector()
Package: g++-3.3
Version: 1:3.3-0pre9
Severity: normal
Hi,
I saw Mark Mitchell's announcement about a final call for tests before
the g++ 3.3 release. So I did some tests and found that this program
generates warnings whereas it did not with g++ 3.2:
// Compile with: g++-3.3 -O -Winline essai.cpp
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
int main(void)
{
vector<int> v(10);
}
$ g++-3.3 -O -Winline essai.cpp
essai.cpp: In member function `std::allocator<_Alloc>::~allocator() [with _Tp =
int]':
essai.cpp:232: instantiated from `static _Tp* std::__simple_alloc<_Tp, _Alloc>::allocate(unsigned int) [with _Tp = int, _Alloc = std::__default_alloc_template<true, 0>]'
essai.cpp:233: instantiated from `_Tp* std::_Vector_alloc_base<_Tp, _Allocator, true>::_M_allocate(unsigned int) [with _Tp = int, _Allocator = std::allocator<int>]'
essai.cpp:127: instantiated from `std::_Vector_base<_Tp, _Alloc>::_Vector_base(unsigned int, typename std::_Vector_alloc_base<_Tp, _Alloc, std::_Alloc_traits<_Tp, _Allocator>::_S_instanceless>::allocator_type&) [with _Tp = int, _Alloc = std::allocator<int>]'
essai.cpp:158: instantiated from `std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(unsigned int) [with _Tp = int, _Alloc = std::allocator<int>]'
essai.cpp:253: instantiated from here
/usr/include/c++/3.3/bits/stl_alloc.h:388: warning: inlining failed in call to
`static void* std::__default_alloc_template<__threads,
__inst>::allocate(unsigned int) [with bool __threads = true, int __inst = 0]
'
essai.cpp:232: warning: called from here
essai.cpp: In member function `std::_Vector_base<_Tp, _Alloc>::~_Vector_base()
[with _Tp = int, _Alloc = std::allocator<int>]':
essai.cpp:242: instantiated from `static void std::__simple_alloc<_Tp, _Alloc>::deallocate(_Tp*, unsigned int) [with _Tp = int, _Alloc = std::__default_alloc_template<true, 0>]'
essai.cpp:242: instantiated from `void std::_Vector_alloc_base<_Tp, _Allocator, true>::_M_deallocate(_Tp*, unsigned int) [with _Tp = int, _Allocator = std::allocator<int>]'
essai.cpp:130: instantiated from `std::_Vector_base<_Tp, _Alloc>::~_Vector_base() [with _Tp = int, _Alloc = std::allocator<int>]'
essai.cpp:253: instantiated from `std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::vector(unsigned int) [with _Tp = int, _Alloc = std::allocator<int>]'
essai.cpp:253: instantiated from here
/usr/include/c++/3.3/bits/stl_alloc.h:429: warning: inlining failed in call to
`static void std::__default_alloc_template<__threads,
__inst>::deallocate(void*, unsigned int) [with bool __threads = true, int
__inst = 0]'
essai.cpp:242: warning: called from here
essai.cpp: In member function `std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::~vector() [with _Tp =
int, _Alloc = std::allocator<int>]':
essai.cpp:242: instantiated from `static void std::__simple_alloc<_Tp, _Alloc>::deallocate(_Tp*, unsigned int) [with _Tp = int, _Alloc = std::__default_alloc_template<true, 0>]'
essai.cpp:242: instantiated from `void std::_Vector_alloc_base<_Tp, _Allocator, true>::_M_deallocate(_Tp*, unsigned int) [with _Tp = int, _Allocator = std::allocator<int>]'
essai.cpp:130: instantiated from `std::_Vector_base<_Tp, _Alloc>::~_Vector_base() [with _Tp = int, _Alloc = std::allocator<int>]'
essai.cpp:162: instantiated from `std::vector<_Tp, _Alloc>::~vector() [with _Tp = int, _Alloc = std::allocator<int>]'
essai.cpp:7: instantiated from here
/usr/include/c++/3.3/bits/stl_alloc.h:429: warning: inlining failed in call to
`static void std::__default_alloc_template<__threads,
__inst>::deallocate(void*, unsigned int) [with bool __threads = true, int
__inst = 0]'
essai.cpp:242: warning: called from here
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux irancy 2.4.20-1-k7 #1 Sat Mar 22 15:17:52 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro
Versions of packages g++-3.3 depends on:
ii gcc-3.3 1:3.3-0pre9 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-3.3-base 1:3.3-0pre9 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libstdc++5-3.3-dev 1:3.3-0pre9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3 (d
-- no debconf information
Reply to: