Bug#190066: gcc-3.3: missing support for x86-64

[Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>]

Arnd Bergmann writes:
> 
> See also Bug#189350 for the required binutils patch.# ignore 64 bit shlibdeps for now, as on s390 and sparc64

you do this for libgcc1 and libstdc++5 only. maybe it's time to build
extra "64" packages. Is there already a naming convention for these
packages (i.e. libgcc164 or libgcc1-64)?

> --- gcc-3.3-3.3ds5/debian/rules.d/binary-libobjc.mk
> +++ gcc-3.3-3.3ds5/debian/rules.d/binary-libobjc.mk
> @@ -15,6 +15,15 @@
>  	$(PF)/lib/libobjc_gc.so.*
>  endif
>  
> +ifeq ($(biarch),yes)
> +	dirs_lobjc   +=	$(PF)/$(lib64)
> +	files_lobjc  +=	$(PF)/$(lib64)/libobjc.so.*
> +ifeq ($(with_objc_gc),yes)
> +	files_lobjc  +=	$(PF)/$(lib64)/libobjc_gc.so.*

there is already a boehm-gc with 64bit support?

> diff -u gcc-3.3-3.3ds5/debian/rules2 gcc-3.3-3.3ds5/debian/rules2
> --- gcc-3.3-3.3ds5/debian/rules2
> +++ gcc-3.3-3.3ds5/debian/rules2
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
>  endif
>  
>  ifeq ($(with_java),yes)
> -  CONFARGS += --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=xlib
> +  CONFARGS += --enable-java-gc=boehm # --enable-java-awt=xlib

hmm, that's bad. any way to disable this conditionally for the 64bit
build only?

	Matthias