Martin Michlmayr writes: > Is there a good reason to keep egcs1.1 in sid? No. I already asked for libstdc++2.10-glibc2.1, but got no answer. And libstdc++2.9-glibc2.1 is much older ... The binary packages can still be fetched from the woody archives, if someone wants them. And we still have gcc272 ... which is / was needed for linux-2.0. Didn't check for the 2.2 kernels, which are still in unstable. I'll file a report for ftp.debian.org. Matthias