Bug#184175: marked as done (gcc-3.3 not properly installed)
Your message dated Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:11:23 +0100
with message-id <15980.65403.668696.840247@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Bug#184175: gcc-3.3 not properly installed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2003 12:30:43 +0000
>From foskey@optushome.com.au Mon Mar 10 06:30:42 2003
Return-path: <foskey@optushome.com.au>
Received: from mail013.syd.optusnet.com.au [210.49.20.171]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18sMQT-00033u-00; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 06:30:41 -0600
Received: from [192.168.0.55] (c18167.rivrw4.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.28.165.15])
by mail013.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h2ACUcE17251
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 23:30:39 +1100
Subject: gcc-3.3 not properly installed
From: Ken Foskey <foskey@optushome.com.au>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization:
Message-Id: <[🔎] 1047299438.2281.50.camel@gandalf.foskey.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2
Date: 10 Mar 2003 23:30:38 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: gcc-3.3
Version: Unknown - Unstable
I have just installed gcc-3.3 and it does not have a proper setup and
there is no compiler. I cannot do an apt-cache show gcc-3.3.
Interesting result really...
--
Thanks
KenF
OpenOffice.org developer
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 184175-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Mar 2003 21:14:49 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Mon Mar 10 15:14:48 2003
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18sUbg-0007rX-00; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:14:48 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (daemon@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA06945;
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:11:24 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id h2ALBN222632;
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:11:23 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15980.65403.668696.840247@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 22:11:23 +0100
To: Ken Foskey <foskey@optushome.com.au>, 184175-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#184175: gcc-3.3 not properly installed
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 1047299438.2281.50.camel@gandalf.foskey.org>
References: <[🔎] 1047299438.2281.50.camel@gandalf.foskey.org>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: 184175-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Ken Foskey writes:
> Package: gcc-3.3
> Version: Unknown - Unstable
>
> I have just installed gcc-3.3 and it does not have a proper setup and
> there is no compiler. I cannot do an apt-cache show gcc-3.3.
> Interesting result really...
apt-cache show gcc-3.3-base
it's a feature, not a bug. gcc-3.3 binaries are currently only built
for s390. You can build them yourself by downloading the gcc-3.3
source, and adding your architecture no_dummy_archs in debian/rules.defs.
Report your results here please which (libstdc++5 dependent)
applications break and which continue to work.
Matthias
PS: I plan to build libgcc1 from the gcc-3.3 source in a week or so on
i386. It does work for me here on i386 for some time. Any other
architectures, which should be considered?
Reply to: