Re: help with gcc-3.2 related bug
Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> writes:
> Well, presumably he is linking using gcc to avoid libstdc++; is there
> anything besides the missing library which g++ would change?
Yes, there are minor differences: g++ adds -lm -lgcc_s, gcc adds -lgcc
(or -lgcc_eh). Those shouldn't make a difference, though.
> Fernando, you may want to try adding -lsupc++ when building with GCC
> 3.2.
This seems risky for building a DSO: libsubc++ is a static library, so
the symbols will be incorporated into libsablot, and then re-exported
from it. Applications that link with libsablot may find that the set
of symbols changes from one libsablot release to another; they may
also find that they have multiple definitions of RTTI objects, which
may interfere.
Regards,
Martin
Reply to: