Bug#176101: g++-3.2: broken c++ code causes g++-3.2 and older to segfault

[Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>]

retitle 176101 [fixed in 3.4] broken c++ code causes g++-3.2 and older to segfault
thanks

$ /usr/lib/gcc-experimental/bin/g++ -c bug-176101.cc
bug-176101.cc:10: warning: all member functions in class `A<T3>' are private
bug-176101.cc: In member function `void A<T3>::f()':
bug-176101.cc:14: error: expected `('
bug-176101.cc:14: error: expected primary-expression

Martin Bayer writes:
> Subject: g++-3.2: broken c++ code causes g++-3.2 and older to segfault
> Package: g++-3.2
> Version: 1:3.2.2-0pre3
> Severity: normal
> Tags: upstream
> 
> The following (broken!) code causes the g++-3.2 to segfault. The behaviour
> happens with older versions of the gcc too.
> 
> ===================================
> =bugcode.cpp
> ===================================
> template<typename T1>
> class map
> {
> public:
>   typedef T1 iterator;
> }; 
> 
> template<typename T3>
> class A
> {
>   typedef map<T3> B;
>   void f()
>   {
>     typename B::iterator<T3> it;
>   }
> };
> ====================================
> 
> compiling it with:
> > g++-3.2 -c gccbug.cpp
> results in 
> =========================================================================
> gccbug.cpp:10: warning: all member functions in class `A<T3>' are private
> gccbug.cpp: In member function `void A<T3>::f()':
> gccbug.cpp:14: internal error: Segmentation fault
> Please submit a full bug report,
> with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> See <URL:http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html> for instructions.
> =========================================================================