Bug#171689: marked as done (libstdc++3 depends on gcc-3)
Your message dated Thu, 5 Dec 2002 00:04:54 +0100
with message-id <15854.35350.474363.120964@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Bug#171689: libstdc++3 depends on gcc-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2002 11:48:59 +0000
>From bodrato@gulp.linux.it Wed Dec 04 05:48:59 2002
Return-path: <bodrato@gulp.linux.it>
Received: from linuz.sns.it (debian) [192.167.206.227]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18JY1T-00079L-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 05:48:59 -0600
Received: from bodrato by debian with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18JY0n-0000At-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 12:48:17 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Marco Bodrato <bodrato@gulp.linux.it>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libstdc++3 depends on gcc-3
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.9
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 12:48:17 +0100
Message-Id: <[🔎] E18JY0n-0000At-00@debian>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libstdc++3
Version: 1:3.0.4-13
Severity: minor
I do not know the usual behaving in Debian, but I do not understand why the
library should depend on the gcc-compiler. I'm not using gcc-3.0 any more,
but I can not uninstall it, because some pacages depend on libstdc++3 which
depends on gcc-3.0.
But the binaries should not depend on the compiler...
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.19-piccolo-2 #1 lun dic 2 16:13:19 CET 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=it_IT@euro, LC_CTYPE=it_IT@euro
Versions of packages libstdc++3 depends on:
hi gcc-3.0-base 1:3.0.4-12 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
hi libc6 2.3.1-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.2.1-1 GCC support library.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 171689-done) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Dec 2002 23:06:13 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Wed Dec 04 17:06:13 2002
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Jiaq-0001cl-00; Wed, 04 Dec 2002 17:06:12 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (daemon@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03345;
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 00:04:55 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id gB4N4sc01479;
Thu, 5 Dec 2002 00:04:54 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15854.35350.474363.120964@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 00:04:54 +0100
To: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>, 171689-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#171689: libstdc++3 depends on gcc-3
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20021204073119.A25740@debian.org>
References: <[🔎] E18JY0n-0000At-00@debian>
<[🔎] 20021204073119.A25740@debian.org>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: 171689-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.2 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Colin Watson writes:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 12:48:17PM +0100, Marco Bodrato wrote:
> > Package: libstdc++3
> > Version: 1:3.0.4-13
> > Severity: minor
> >
> > I do not know the usual behaving in Debian, but I do not understand why the
> > library should depend on the gcc-compiler. I'm not using gcc-3.0 any more,
> > but I can not uninstall it, because some pacages depend on libstdc++3 which
> > depends on gcc-3.0.
> > But the binaries should not depend on the compiler...
>
> libstdc++3 does not depend on the compiler, which is in gcc-3.0. It
> merely depends on gcc-3.0-base, which contains a few documentation
> files.
closing the report ...
Reply to: