Bug#151886: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa
- To: Camm Maguire <camm@enhanced.com>
- Cc: LaMont Jones <lamont@security.hp.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>, gcl-devel@gnu.org, debian-hppa@lists.debian.org, Grant Grundler <grundler@dsl2.external.hp.com>, lamont+buildd@hp.com, 146070@bugs.debian.org, 151886@bugs.debian.org, Maxima List <maxima@www.ma.utexas.edu>
- Subject: Bug#151886: [Gcl-devel] Re: gcl/maxima on hppa
- From: Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:55:29 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20021009165529.GG5602@tausq.org>
- Reply-to: Randolph Chung <tausq@debian.org>, 151886@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 543crgkzd7.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com>
- References: <54d6t334ew.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com> <20020731235020.A3797@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <5465xaoty7.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com> <20020913142225.GN15169@security.hp.com> <[🔎] 543crgkzd7.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com>
> 1) When compiling with -g, the final link fails, and explicitly asks
> for recompilation with -ffunction-sections. This works, and
> produces a maxima passing all tests.
known problem with gcc-3.0.x
> 2) Any optimization at all breaks the build. I have a gdb
> session/backtrace showing pointers not being passed correctly into
> functions if anyone is interested in looking into this.
can you please try gcc-3.2 as well?
good to hear you finally got it to work though :-)
randolph
Reply to: