Re: GNAT and related packages
Phil Brooke writes:
> Sam Tardieu recently orphaned a number of GNAT-related packages.
>
> I've posted ITAs on three of them: adacgi, adasockets and libgtkada. All
> three have new upstream versions (and I need to remind myself what is in
> the Debian policy regarding libraries).
>
> I might post ITAs on asis, gnat-glade and gnat-glade-doc. Less likely, I
> might also take up gnat and gnat-doc. (Oh, and gvd. Long day.)
>
> Before I go any further, can anyone suggest what might happen to the
> current gnat and gnat-doc packages, given that the source package gcc-3.2
> includes binaries gnat-3.2, libgnat3.15a and gnat-3.2-doc?
>
> What I'm really after here is some advice on where things might go with
> the packages I'm considering. (I consider myself to be a very new
> developer, so I'm trying to tread very carefully indeed!)
you may want to take gnat and gnat-doc, as these are unmaintained. You
are welcome to take care of gnat-3.2 and gnat-3.2-doc. For the latter
two you would have to send patches to the gcc-3.2 source package.
Reply to: