Re: GCC 3.2 transition
On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 09:59:28AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > * Add a Conflict with the non-`c' version of the package.
>
> why can't we have both installed, just like the libfoo6 and libfoo6g
> situation??
i explained this elsewhere...
Why don't we put the libs in a different directory?
Basically, it's too complex. For the glibc transition, we could do this
because they used different dynamic linkers.
Or can you think of a good way of having them both install without
having conflicting files?
--
Revolutions do not require corporate support.
Reply to: