Bug#156615: marked as done (gcc-3.2 - Description improvement)
Your message dated Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:05:06 +0200
with message-id <20020814090506.GA21828@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>
and subject line Bug#156615: gcc-3.2 - Description improvement
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2002 07:18:08 +0000
>From joey@infodrom.org Wed Aug 14 02:18:08 2002
Return-path: <joey@infodrom.org>
Received: from luonnotar.infodrom.org [195.124.48.78]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17esPw-00072C-00; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 02:18:08 -0500
Received: by luonnotar.infodrom.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 95211366AD3; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:17:37 +0200 (CEST)
Received: at Infodrom Oldenburg (/\##/\ Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2)
from infodrom.org by finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE
via smail from stdin
id <[🔎] m17esGH-000qHUC@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE>
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:08:09 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <[🔎] m17esGH-000qHUC@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:08:09 +0200 (CEST)
From: joey@infodrom.org (Martin Schulze)
To: submit@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bugtracking System)
Subject: gcc-3.2 - Description improvement
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: gcc-3.2
Version: current
Severity: minor
- Description: The GNU C compiler
+ Description: GNU Compiler Collection 3.2
It's called "GNU Compiler Collection" since 1999, btw/fyi.
Regards,
Joey
--
Let's call it an accidental feature. --Larry Wall
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 156615-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2002 09:08:10 +0000
>From joey@infodrom.org Wed Aug 14 04:08:10 2002
Return-path: <joey@infodrom.org>
Received: from luonnotar.infodrom.org [195.124.48.78]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17eu8Q-0006Dd-00; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 04:08:10 -0500
Received: by luonnotar.infodrom.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 8DA51366AD3; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:07:39 +0200 (CEST)
Received: at Infodrom Oldenburg (/\##/\ Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2)
from infodrom.org by finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE
via smail from stdin
id <m17eu5S-000qHWC@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE>
for 156615-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:05:06 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 11:05:06 +0200
From: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>
To: Philip Blundell <pb@nexus.co.uk>
Cc: 156615-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#156615: gcc-3.2 - Description improvement
Message-ID: <20020814090506.GA21828@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>
References: <[🔎] m17esGH-000qHUC@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE> <[🔎] 1029314240.25065.9.camel@mill>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 1029314240.25065.9.camel@mill>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: 156615-done@bugs.debian.org
Philip Blundell wrote:
> > - Description: The GNU C compiler
> > + Description: GNU Compiler Collection 3.2
> >
> > It's called "GNU Compiler Collection" since 1999, btw/fyi.
>
> That's indeed the name of the upstream project. However, the compiler
> that's provided in the gcc-3.2 package is specifically for C. The
> existing short description seems ideal: it would be misleading to
> describe the package as a "compiler collection" when only a single
> compiler is included.
Indeed. You're correct.
> Perhaps it would be reasonable to mention in the long description that
> the C compiler is part of the GNU Compiler Collection, though.
That's what the long description is for, I guess. (I haven't checked
it yet).
Regards,
Joey
--
Let's call it an accidental feature. --Larry Wall
Reply to: