[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#156603: marked as done (Outdated package description)



Your message dated Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:05:04 +0200
with message-id <15705.58624.221657.158263@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Bug#156603: Outdated package description
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2002 01:59:18 +0000
>From bli@bli.melix.com.mx Tue Aug 13 20:59:18 2002
Return-path: <bli@bli.melix.com.mx>
Received: from bli.melix.com.mx [200.53.250.254] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17enRN-0003qo-00; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:59:18 -0500
Received: by bli.melix.com.mx (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id B660D42DCF; Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:59:11 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 20:59:11 -0500
From: Thomas Bliesener <nospam@melix.com.mx>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Outdated package description
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20020814015911.GV539@bli.melix.com.mx>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: gcc
Version: 3.2

The package description (e.g.
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/gcc-3.2.html) mentions still
the old name "GNU C compiler" instead of "GNU Compiler Collection".
-- 
bli

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 156603-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2002 05:09:09 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Wed Aug 14 00:09:09 2002
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17eqP7-0002Wx-00; Wed, 14 Aug 2002 00:09:09 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (daemon@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA28568;
	Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:05:04 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
	by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id g7E554S26805;
	Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:05:04 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15705.58624.221657.158263@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:05:04 +0200
To: Thomas Bliesener <nospam@melix.com.mx>, 156603-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#156603: Outdated package description
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20020814015911.GV539@bli.melix.com.mx>
References: <[🔎] 20020814015911.GV539@bli.melix.com.mx>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: 156603-done@bugs.debian.org

Thomas Bliesener writes:
> Package: gcc
> Version: 3.2
> 
> The package description (e.g.
> http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/gcc-3.2.html) mentions still
> the old name "GNU C compiler" instead of "GNU Compiler Collection".

the package still contains the C compiler only, not the whole
collection.



Reply to: