Bug#137959: Bug #137959
Greetings!
LaMont Jones <lamont@hp.com> writes:
> > Can you clarify whether this is a new failure, or one that has just gone
> > unnoticed previously?
>
> The blas package has previously built (although auric is down so I can't
> see _which_version...). I don't know if this code changed between then and
> now, or if this is a new bug in g77.
>
Yes, -7 built on arm just fine, now -8 has a catastrophic failure --
no changes between the two except for a retriction of the test cases
run on hppa, a modification which I was sure until a few moment ago
would get blas into testing! :-(.
Take care,
> > I'm downgrading it to "important" on the assumption that the bug has
> > existed in all older versions of the compiler as well. If it's actually
> > a regression, please feel free to set it back to "serious"; in that
> > case, it would help to know what the last version was that worked.
>
> > It would also be interesting to know whether gcc-snapshot is able to
> > compile the code successfully.
>
> I'll work on these later tonight when I get home.
>
> lamont
>
>
--
Camm Maguire camm@enhanced.com
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: