[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Generates bad code for indirect function calls on pa-risc



>Submitter-Id:	net
>Originator:	
>Organization:	Debian Project
>Confidential:	no
>Synopsis:	Generates bad code for indirect calls on pa-risc
>Severity:	serious
>Priority:	medium
>Category:	target
>Class:		wrong-code
>Release:	3.0.3 (Debian testing/unstable)
>Environment:
System: Linux sarti 2.4.16-64 #1 Fri Dec 7 16:08:36 MST 2001 parisc64 unknown
Architecture: parisc64

	
host: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
build: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
target: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,f77,proto,objc --prefix=/usr --infodir=/share/info --mandir=/share/man --enable-shared --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-system-zlib --enable-long-long --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --disable-checking --enable-threads=posix --with-cpp-install-dir=bin hppa-linux
>Description:
The Ghostscript binary built with gcc 3.0.3 on pa-risc is incorrect. I 
tracked the problem to the code generated by gcc when calling a function
via a function pointer. Interestingly this only applies to the 
floating point arguments. Everything else seems to work fine. 

Here is what I consider a very nice example of the problem:

---
#include <stdio.h>
void	out(const char *str, double x)
{
	printf("%s: %f\n", str, x);
}
int	main(int argc, char **argv)
{
	void	(*f)(const char *, double) = out;
	f("Calling via function pointer", 3.1415926535);
	out("Calling directly", 3.1415926535);
	return 0;
}
---

The output of this program is as follows:

---
torsten@sarti:~/gccbug$ gcc realind.c -o realind -lm
torsten@sarti:~/gccbug$ ./realind
Calling via function pointer: 0.000000
Calling directly: 3.141593
---
>How-To-Repeat:
Building the program above should suffice for repeating the problem. Let
me know if it works on your system :)
>Fix:
I don't know a viable work around. You could avoid using function pointers
or pass the floating point values by reference. 



Reply to: