Bug#102193: gcc-3.0: compiled code with gcc 3.0 is slow and big
Phil Edwards writes:
>
> On top of all the other reasons already mentioned, the memory expansion
> code for basic_string<> in 3.0 wasn't as good as it could be (and it
> wasn't strictly conforming in some cases). These problems have already
> been fixed for 3.1; there are some spiffy benchmarks in the libstdc++
> mailing list archives.
>
> If building from source, there is a library snapshot (called 3.0.95) which
> can be used for the 3.0 compiler. Dunno how this would work with Debian.
how stable is this compared to 3.0.3? Is the ABI upward compatible, so
that it could replace 3.0.3?
Reply to: