[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#127783: gcc-3.0-source: java selftest fail



Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:

> Goswin Brederlow writes:
> > Package: gcc-3.0
> > Version: 1:3.0.3-1
> > Severity: normal
> > 
> > The package doesn't pass its selftests and _should_fail_ to build.
> > It should fail when the first make fails and not continue with other
> > selftest, otherwise errors get overlocked.
> 
> huh? then we'll never have a build which succeeds ...

Some test are expected to fail, thats fine. I hope the expected
failures don't make the make return with an error too.

But an unexpected failure suggests a new error. That should fail and
stop the build.

> > The timeout might be the reason why it fails to build on m68k,
> > something just takes too long during build.
> 
> the timeout is a buildd problem, not a gcc problem.

The timeout on m68k might take longer than 150 minutes from the last
line it outputs. Then the buildd assumes its in a loop and kills
it. Maybe a little more verbose output would solve the problem or help
pinpoint the exact testcase that makes it fail.

> > 		=== libjava Summary ===
> > 
> > # of expected passes		1674
> > # of unexpected failures	1
> > # of unexpected successes	10
> > # of expected failures		14
> > # of untested testcases		17
> > make[5]: *** [check-DEJAGNU] Error 1
> > make[5]: Leaving directory `/tmp/gcc-3.0-3.0.3ds3/build/i386-linux/libjava/testsuite'
> > make[4]: *** [check-am] Error 2
> > make[4]: Target `check' not remade because of errors.
> > make[4]: Leaving directory `/tmp/gcc-3.0-3.0.3ds3/build/i386-linux/libjava/testsuite'
> > ======================================================================
> 
> you deleted the interesting part. where/why doesn't it continue?

It does. I think the next one was the gcc tests. That shouldn't be
caried out since the libjava tests failed (unexpectedly).

MfG
        Goswin



Reply to: