Bug#102193: marked as done (gcc-3.0: compiled code with gcc 3.0 is slow and big :-()
Your message dated Fri, 27 Dec 2002 23:53:25 +0100
with message-id <15884.55781.582933.986081@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line closing gcc report with updated benchmark results (2.95, 3.0, 3.2, 3.3)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jun 2001 09:10:02 +0000
>From lgb@vega.digitel2002.hu Mon Jun 25 04:10:02 2001
Return-path: <lgb@vega.digitel2002.hu>
Received: from vega.digitel2002.hu [::ffff:213.163.0.181]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15ESNe-0001Ll-00; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 04:10:02 -0500
Received: by vega.digitel2002.hu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 8D8CF172E4; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:08:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gabor Lenart <lgb@vega.digitel2002.hu>
Subject: gcc-3.0: compiled code with gcc 3.0 is slow and big :-(
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.9
Message-Id: <20010625090829.8D8CF172E4@vega.digitel2002.hu>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:08:29 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: gcc-3.0
Version: 1:3.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
I'm Gabor Lenart from Hungary and we're developing a movie player software
for Linux. We tried to compile and benchmark mplayer (our player) with both
of gcc 3.0 and gcc 2.95. We found out that gcc 3.0 produces SLOWER and BIGGER
code than 2.95. Is it normal? If it is, I will refuse to use gcc 3.0 since
I need maximum speed, since on my AMD K6-2 DVD playback is a very CPU
sensitive situation.
Bye, Gabor
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux vega 2.2.19 #1 Wed Apr 4 14:41:06 CEST 2001 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages gcc-3.0 depends on:
ii cpp-3.0 3.0-2 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii gcc-3.0-base 3.0-2 The GNU compiler collection (base package).
ii libgcc1 3.0-2 GCC support library.
ii binutils 2.11.90.0.7-2 The GNU assembler, linker and binary utiliti
ii libc6 2.2.3-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 102193-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2002 22:58:35 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Fri Dec 27 16:58:35 2002
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18S3R4-0000VQ-00; Fri, 27 Dec 2002 16:58:35 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (daemon@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA15981;
Fri, 27 Dec 2002 23:53:26 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id gBRMrPp17474;
Fri, 27 Dec 2002 23:53:25 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15884.55781.582933.986081@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 23:53:25 +0100
To: 102193-done@bugs.debian.org
CC: Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>,
Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>,
Gabor Lenart <lgb@vega.digitel2002.hu>,
Morten Brix Pedersen <morten@wtf.dk>
Subject: closing gcc report with updated benchmark results (2.95, 3.0, 3.2, 3.3)
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: 102193-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
updated results, all are current Debian versions (gcc-3.3 is the
current snapshot package): checked on ix86
Closing the report with these results ...
-O0 -O2 -O3
--------+-----------------------------------------------------------------
gcc-2.95| real 0m2.779s real 0m1.715s real 0m1.711s
| user 0m2.690s user 0m1.560s user 0m1.600s
| sys 0m0.080s sys 0m0.160s sys 0m0.110s
|
gcc-3.0 | real 0m4.166s real 0m1.689s real 0m1.732s
| user 0m4.020s user 0m1.640s user 0m1.620s
| sys 0m0.140s sys 0m0.040s sys 0m0.110s
|
gcc-3.2 | real 0m2.159s real 0m1.863s real 0m1.650s
| user 0m2.050s user 0m1.810s user 0m1.590s
| sys 0m0.110s sys 0m0.050s sys 0m0.050s
|
gcc-3.3 | real 0m1.653s real 0m1.374s real 0m1.396s
| user 0m1.580s user 0m1.310s user 0m1.340s
| sys 0m0.080s sys 0m0.060s sys 0m0.060s
Reply to: