[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

race condition in libstdc++3 (basic_string.tcc)



>Submitter-Id:	net
>Originator:	"Carl R. Witty" <cwitty@newtonlabs.com>
>Organization:	The Debian Project
>Confidential:	no
>Synopsis:	
>Severity:	non-critical
>Priority:	low
>Category:	libstdc++
>Class:		change-request
>Release:	3.2.1 (Debian) (Debian unstable)
>Environment:
System: Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
Architecture: i686
host: i386-linux
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,pascal,objc,ada --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/3.2 --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-objc-gc i386-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.2.2 20021212 (Debian prerelease)
>Description:
[ Reported to the Debian BTS as report #140201.
  Please CC 140201@bugs.debian.org on replies.
  Log of report can be found at http://bugs.debian.org/140201 ]
	

[implementation is the same as on the 3.2 branch]

The function basic_string::_M_leak_hard() in basic_string.tcc is not
thread-safe.  The reference count is read with _M_is_shared() and
then written with _M_set_leaked(), non-atomically.  (This is only a
bug if the string class is supposed to be thread-safe.  I haven't found
an explicit statement that it is, but most of the string operations
are written to be thread-safe.)


>How-To-Repeat:
	
>Fix:
	



Reply to: