Bug#169140: marked as done (Problem with libstdc++-libc6 [ with how-to-fix ])
Your message dated Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:54:56 +0100
with message-id <15828.39488.519914.169358@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Processed: Re: Bug#169139: Problem with libstdc++-libc6 [ with how-to-fix ]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2002 21:22:35 +0000
>From moritz@kobelnet.ch Thu Nov 14 15:22:34 2002
Return-path: <moritz@kobelnet.ch>
Received: from 142.catv44.blp01.lan.ch (democritus.kobelnet) [212.60.44.142]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18CRRY-0002FC-00; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:22:32 -0600
Received: from kobelnet.ch (moritz@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by democritus.kobelnet (8.12.6/8.12.6/Debian-8) with ESMTP id gAELLvm6023101
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 22:21:57 +0100
Message-ID: <3DD413F5.4010803@kobelnet.ch>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 22:21:57 +0100
From: Moritz Kobel <moritz@kobelnet.ch>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020913 Debian/1.1-1
X-Accept-Language: de-ch, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Problem with libstdc++-libc6 [ with how-to-fix ]
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.65.2.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MOZILLA_UA,
X_ACCEPT_LANG
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libstdc++-libc
Hello,
( I use the testing version of debian )
i could not run aptitude, apt-get and so on:
----
democritus:/usr/lib# aptitude
aptitude: error while loading shared libraries
libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file
or directory
-----
In /usr/lib i created a link, i think the library has the wrong name
----
democritus:/usr/lib# ln -s libstdc++libc6.2-2.so.3 libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3
----
After i created this link, all ( as i saw until now ) worked as before...
Greetings
Moritz Kobel
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 169139-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2002 06:59:09 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Fri Nov 15 00:59:06 2002
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18CaRV-0005tL-00; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 00:59:05 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (daemon@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA26620
for <169139-done@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:54:56 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id gAF6suG05228;
Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:54:56 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15828.39488.519914.169358@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 07:54:56 +0100
To: 169139-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#169139: Problem with libstdc++-libc6 [ with how-to-fix ]
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] handler.s.C.103731467820768.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <20021114225756.GA19060@riva.ucam.org>
<[🔎] handler.s.C.103731467820768.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: 169139-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
fixed in libstdc++3-glibc2.2_2.95.4-15.
Reply to: