Bug#148725: marked as done (gij-3.1 should provide java-runtime2)
Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:38:47 +0200
with message-id <15665.28887.3420.344786@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Bug#148725: gij-3.1, java-runtime2 and libbtools-java
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jun 2002 08:27:00 +0000
>From mkoch@konqueror.de Sat Jun 01 03:27:00 2002
Return-path: <mkoch@konqueror.de>
Received: from mail2.ewetel.de [212.6.122.20]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17E4E0-0002sg-00; Sat, 01 Jun 2002 03:27:00 -0500
Received: from mail.konqueror.de (dsl-ler-213-170-182-126.ewetel.net [213.170.182.126])
by mail2.ewetel.de (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g518QR6S007198;
Sat, 1 Jun 2002 10:26:28 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from asterix.konqueror.de (asterix.konqueror.de [192.168.1.100])
by mail.konqueror.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 0A055AF12; Sat, 1 Jun 2002 10:26:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mkoch by asterix.konqueror.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 17E4DR-0001SX-00; Sat, 01 Jun 2002 10:26:25 +0200
Subject: gij-3.1 should provide java-runtime2
From: "Michael Koch" <konqueror@gmx.de>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <submit@bugs.debian.org>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.30
Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2002 10:26:25 +0200
Message-Id: <E17E4DR-0001SX-00@asterix.konqueror.de>
Sender: Michael Koch <mkoch@konqueror.de>
X-CheckCompat: OK
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: gij-3.1
Version: 1:3.1-2
Severity: normal
gij-3.1 should provide java-runtime2. I found that I cant install
libbtools-java because no package provides java-runtime2 except
j2sdk1.3.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux asterix 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro (ignored: LC_ALL set)
Versions of packages gij-3.1 depends on:
ii gcc-3.1-base 1:3.1-2 The GNU Compiler Collection (base
ii libc6 2.2.5-6 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.1-2 GCC support library.
ii libgcj3 1:3.1-2 Java runtime library for use with
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-1 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 148725-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2002 12:39:34 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Sun Jul 14 07:39:34 2002
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17Tiez-0003e2-00; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 07:39:33 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (daemon@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA10894;
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:38:47 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id g6ECclu10306;
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:38:47 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15665.28887.3420.344786@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 14:38:47 +0200
To: Ben Burton <benb@acm.org>, 148725-done@bugs.debian.org
Cc: konqueror@gmx.de, control@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#148725: gij-3.1, java-runtime2 and libbtools-java
In-Reply-To: <E17JVvA-0005xj-00@localhost>
References: <E17JVvA-0005xj-00@localhost>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: 148725-done@bugs.debian.org
Ok, closing the report. swing isn't supported by gcj-3.1.
Ben Burton writes:
>
> Just wrt the libbtools-java issue that spawned this bug report:
>
> > Most of the core packages in libgcj 3.1 are JDK 1.2 compatible, and in
> > many cases they are already JDK 1.3 or 1.4 compatible. However, we do
> > not yet have complete implementations of every package that makes up JDK
> > 1.2 (for example Swing is missing and AWT is incomplete).
>
> It's primarily the requirement on javax.swing that forces libbtools-java to
> depend on java2-runtime.
>
> Ben.
>
> --
>
> Ben Burton
> benb@acm.org | bab@debian.org
> http://baasil.humbug.org.au/bab/
> Public Key: finger bab@debian.org
>
> Arguments are to be avoided; they are always vulgar and often convincing.
> - Oscar Wilde
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: