[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#149097: marked as done (gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???)



Your message dated Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:03:13 +0200
with message-id <15665.23153.566248.976391@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Bug#149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Jun 2002 09:00:29 +0000
>From egm2@jps.net Wed Jun 05 04:00:29 2002
Return-path: <egm2@jps.net>
Received: from sire.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.182] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17FWeb-0007Yj-00; Wed, 05 Jun 2002 04:00:29 -0500
Received: from 216-119-23-172.o1.jps.net ([216.119.23.172] helo=localhost)
	by sire.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #2)
	id 17FWeZ-00033G-00
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2002 02:00:27 -0700
Received: from felix by localhost with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17FWgP-00043Z-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 05 Jun 2002 02:02:21 -0700
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 02:02:21 -0700
From: "Eric G. Miller" <egm2@jps.net>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???
Message-ID: <20020605090221.GA15527@calico.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: "Eric G. Miller" <egm2@jps.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: gnat-3.1-doc
Version: 3.1-2
Severity: wishlist

The gnat-doc package included the Ada95 Reference Manual in info format,
however this is not included in gnat-3.1-doc.  It'd be desirable to 
make this document available, possibly as it's own package to avoid the
conflict between gnat-doc and gnat-3.1-doc ??  The document specifies
the language and is therefore the definitive reference.  The docs in the
current gnat-3.1-doc supplement the "ARM" but don't provide the same
information.

Thanks,
-- 
Eric G. Miller <egm2@jps.net>

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 149097-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jul 2002 11:04:55 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Sun Jul 14 06:04:55 2002
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17ThBO-0000sz-00; Sun, 14 Jul 2002 06:04:55 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (daemon@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA02496;
	Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:03:13 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
	by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) id g6EB3D905183;
	Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:03:13 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15665.23153.566248.976391@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2002 13:03:13 +0200
To: "Eric G. Miller" <egm2@jps.net>, 149097-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#149097: gnat-3.1-doc, Ada Reference Manual ???
In-Reply-To: <20020605090221.GA15527@calico.local>
References: <20020605090221.GA15527@calico.local>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: 149097-done@bugs.debian.org

It is included: gnat-rm-3.1

Eric G. Miller writes:
> Package: gnat-3.1-doc
> Version: 3.1-2
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> The gnat-doc package included the Ada95 Reference Manual in info format,
> however this is not included in gnat-3.1-doc.  It'd be desirable to 
> make this document available, possibly as it's own package to avoid the
> conflict between gnat-doc and gnat-3.1-doc ??  The document specifies
> the language and is therefore the definitive reference.  The docs in the
> current gnat-3.1-doc supplement the "ARM" but don't provide the same
> information.
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Eric G. Miller <egm2@jps.net>
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: