Bug#136351: gcc-3.0: missing alternatives?
Erich Schubert <erich@debian.org> cum veritate scripsit:
> > Should we do a debconf item for this? I'm getting tired of seeing this
> > question pop up at least once every two weeks for months now...and I'm
> > sure I'm not alone :-)
>
> Maybe tag the bug "wontfix" and leave it open?
> I wouldn't consider this bug as "fixed", but as "should not be fixed".
> Actually this does meet exactly the idea of "wontfix", doesn't it?
pentium-builder implements exactly this, and in a better way, even.
This bug doesn't really have much value.
regards,
junichi
--
dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Reply to: