Bug#135651: libstdc++2.10-dev: upgrade fails "version GLIBC_2.2 not found
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 06:11:52PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> I don't think this is related to libstdc++2.10-dev (a dev package not
> containing any shared libs).
As I said, the apt maintainer wasn't willing to accept the bug as
their fault. Since libstdc++2.10-dev fails install and seems to cause
catastophic failures with the dist-upgrade, you're second choice.
> > First significant bug is:
> >
> > Preparing to replace libstdc++2.10-dev 1:2.95.2-13 (using .../libstdc++2.10-dev_1%3a2.95.4-1_i386.deb) ...
> > perl: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.2' not found (required by /lib/libdb.so.3)
>
> This is NOT the first bug, why does perl print the error message?
You are welcome to look through the logs in
http://www.blars.org/obfucsate/ and find an earlier falure to blame if
you can. dist-upgrade2.gz is the relivent one for this.
--
Blars Blarson blarson@blars.org
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
"Text is a way we cheat time." -- Patrick Nielsen Hayden
Reply to: