Re: gcc-2.95.3
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 11:57:41PM +0100, Peter Koellner wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Ben Collins wrote:
>
> > >
> > > well, and then take the fact that dpkg gcc 2.95.4 is derived from the original
> > > sources of gcc 2.95.2..
> > >
> >
> > I have no idea where you get this from. The compiler core is straight
> > from GCC's 2.95.4, plus some CVS patches. Yeah, maybe parts like libg++
> > are still the same version as from 2.95.2, but that's not the compiler.
>
> i have that from http://packages.debian.org/testing/devel/gcc.html,
> at the Source Code line:
>
> Source Code:
> [dsc]
> [gcc_2.95.2.orig.tar.gz]
> [gcc_2.95.2-20.diff.gz]
> || [dsc]
> [gcc-defaults_0.16.tar.gz]
That page appears to be somewhere buggy.
--
.----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=-----.
/ Ben Collins -- Debian GNU/Linux -- WatchGuard.com \
` bcollins@debian.org -- Ben.Collins@watchguard.com '
`---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'
Reply to: