[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#117067: marked as done (gcc-doc: version should be higher)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Jan 2002 22:36:41 +0100
with message-id <15424.44137.754522.951715@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Bug#117067: This means no info documentation for gcc
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2001 15:42:37 +0000
>From aj@aka.dk.eu.org Thu Oct 25 10:42:37 2001
Return-path: <aj@aka.dk.eu.org>
Received: from port49.ds1-aboes.adsl.cybercity.dk (brick) [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15wmeT-00046u-00; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:42:37 -0500
Received: from aj by brick with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
	id 15wmde-0000dx-00; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:41:46 +0200
From: Anna Jonna Armannsdottir <aj@aka.dk.eu.org>
Subject: gcc-doc: version should be higher
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Message-Id: <E15wmde-0000dx-00@brick>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:41:46 +0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: gcc-doc
Version: N/A
Severity: normal

gcc conflicts with gcc-doc (<< 2.95.3)

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux brick 2.4.10.worker.2 #1 tir sep 25 02:54:02 CEST 2001 i686 unknown

Received: (at 117067-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2002 21:41:09 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Sat Jan 12 15:41:09 2002
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16PVtl-0000ng-00; Sat, 12 Jan 2002 15:41:09 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (doko@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA23525;
	Sat, 12 Jan 2002 22:36:42 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
	by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g0CLafW16114;
	Sat, 12 Jan 2002 22:36:41 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15424.44137.754522.951715@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 22:36:41 +0100
To: "Bang, Steinar" <Steinar.bang@tandbergtv.com>, 117067-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#117067: This means no info documentation for gcc
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 194F8BB4FDB2D311B4010008C733C774017E5A30@no-mail.oslo.tandbergtv.lan>
References: <[🔎] 194F8BB4FDB2D311B4010008C733C774017E5A30@no-mail.oslo.tandbergtv.lan>
X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: 117067-done@bugs.debian.org

Bang, Steinar writes:
> This bug results in no info documentation being available for
> gcc in testing.
> I tried doing apt-get install gcc-doc, on a testing system, today, but 
> found that this would have resultet in removal of gcc, g++, and some 
> libraries, so I stopped.

gcc-doc is replaced by gcc-2.95-doc. Fixed in 2.95.4-1.

> This email, its content and any attachments is PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL to
> TANDBERG Television. If received in error please notify the sender and
> destroy the original message and attachments.

please don't post such nonsense to a publically archived mailing list.

Reply to: