Bug#110231: Still unresolved in my opinion
Scott Johnson writes:
> >
> >Which no one else saw. It would be a lot more clear if that had gone
> >to the BTS. All I saw was a suggestion to try something and a reply
> >complaining about how no one was helping you.
>
> I received the message about replying to 110231@bugs.debian.org after I got
> the initial reply from Matthias. I didn't mean to imply that nobody was
> helping me. My message was in reply to the closure and that I felt that it
> wasn't actually in that state. Matthias obviously replied VERY fast.. even
> fast enough to beat the message from BTS.
returned home. well, I closed the report because it looks like a very
common installation problem.
> >What are the versions on libc6, libc6-dev, g++ (if already installed),
> >libstdc++*, libstdc++*-dev (if already installed), gcc, gcc-3.0, gcc-2.95
> >and gcc-3.0-base?
>
> ns1:/etc/apt# dpkg -s libc6 | grep ^Version
> Version: 2.2.3-6
> ns1:/etc/apt# dpkg -s gcc | grep ^Version
> Version: 1:2.95.2-13
> libstdc++2.10-dev (as reported by apt-get.. I can't seem to find it)
- where did you find libc6-2.2.3-6 in the stable/potato dist?
- why isn't libstdc++2.10-dev 2.95.[34] found?
This doesn't look like a standard installation. IMO if you already
have glibc-2.2, you should upgrade to testing.
Reply to: