[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#93929: marked as done (chill has description of objective-c)



Your message dated Mon, 28 May 2001 00:10:27 +0200 (MEST)
with message-id <15121.31462.210258.128546@bolero>
and subject line fixed in gcc-defaults-0.8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Apr 2001 04:26:50 +0000
>From juergen.erhard@gmx.net Fri Apr 13 23:26:50 2001
Return-path: <juergen.erhard@gmx.net>
Received: from fbgdi4-145-253-170-007.arcor-ip.net (wanderer.local) [145.253.170.7] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 14oHe5-0003WY-00; Fri, 13 Apr 2001 23:26:49 -0500
Received: from jae by wanderer.local with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
	id 14oHdz-00009q-00; Sat, 14 Apr 2001 06:26:43 +0200
From: "Jürgen A. Erhard" <juergen.erhard@gmx.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: chill has description of objective-c
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.14
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.14
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2001 06:26:42 +0200
Message-Id: <E14oHdz-00009q-00@wanderer.local>
Sender: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=FCrgen_A=2E_Erhard?= <jae@ilk.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: chill
Version: N/A; reported 2001-04-14
Severity: minor

Uhm, the package has both short and long description identical to the gobjc.
The chill-2.95 package has the correct descriptions.

BTW, there's no chill-3.0 package... is this an oversight or is chill no
longer a part of the GCC?

Not that I use it... I'm just your average language-collecting freak, and so
I noticed ;-)

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux wanderer 2.2.19-wanderer #2 Mon Mar 26 16:20:48 CEST 2001 i686


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 93929-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 May 2001 22:14:44 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Sun May 27 17:14:44 2001
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 1548o8-0005PI-00; Sun, 27 May 2001 17:14:44 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (doko@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03544;
	Mon, 28 May 2001 00:10:28 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
	by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id AAA01813;
	Mon, 28 May 2001 00:10:28 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 00:10:27 +0200 (MEST)
To: 93929-done@bugs.debian.org, 96272-done@bugs.debian.org,
        96273-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: fixed in gcc-defaults-0.8
X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs  Lucid
Message-ID: <15121.31462.210258.128546@bolero>
Delivered-To: 93929-done@bugs.debian.org

gcc-defaults (0.8) unstable; urgency=low

  * Update version number to 2.95.4 (except m68k).
  * debian/control.m4: correct CHILL description (closes: #93929).
  * Default to 3.0 for ia64-linux, mips-linux and mipsel-linux
  * gcj defaults to 3.0 for all architectures.
  * Fix suggestions of task packages (closes: #96272, #96273).



Reply to: