Misleading error message for "unsigned long double"
>Submitter-Id: net
>Originator: Brian Herlihy
>Organization: Me
>Confidential: no
>Synopsis: Misleading error message for "unsigned long double"
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Category: c
>Class: doc-bug
>Release: 3.0.3 20011209 (Debian prerelease) (Debian testing/unstable)
>Environment:
System: Linux btherl 2.4.16 #5 Mon Dec 3 10:34:12 EST 2001 i686 unknown
Architecture: i686
host: i386-pc-linux-gnu
build: i386-pc-linux-gnu
target: i386-pc-linux-gnu
configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++,java,f77,proto,objc --prefix=/usr --infodir=/share/info --mandir=/share/man --enable-shared --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --with-system-zlib --enable-long-long --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --disable-checking --enable-threads=posix --enable-java-gc=boehm --with-cpp-install-dir=bin --enable-objc-gc i386-linux
>Description:
Error message is misleading for illegal definition. long doubles are
allowed, although the error message implies that they are not.
>How-To-Repeat:
cat > t.c
unsigned long double fred;
main () {}
^D
gcc-3.0 -o t t.c
>Fix:
vi <file_with_error_message> # :)
The error message is:
t.c:1: long, short, signed or unsigned invalid for `fred'
which implies that all these qualifiers are invalid. In fact,
a long double is valid. The error message for "unsigned short double"
gives this information; it would be nice to have this message appear
for "unsigned long double" as well.
Believe it or not I found this because of code which had an unsigned
long double in it that compiled in windows..
Reply to: