[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#101371: marked as done ([PR libstdc++/3551] error in auto_ptr implementation)



Your message dated Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:30:48 +0000
with message-id <20011128183048.L3953@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
and subject line upstream closed bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2001 21:06:00 +0000
>From wichert@cistron.nl Mon Jun 18 16:06:00 2001
Return-path: <wichert@cistron.nl>
Received: from klecker.debian.org [::ffff:198.186.203.20] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15C6Dg-0000IU-00; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:06:00 -0500
Received: from morsig.xs4all.nl (fog.mors.wiggy.net) [213.84.43.14] 
	by klecker.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15C6De-0001PP-00; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:05:59 -0700
Received: from fog.mors.wiggy.net (IDENT:ORVM5jjQbP3e/oI92zTID6fGs7AIk2X8@localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (8.12.0.Beta10/8.12.0.Beta10/Debian 8.12.0.Beta10) with ESMTP id f5IL3U7q026161;
	Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:03:30 +0200
Received: (from wichert@localhost)
        by fog.mors.wiggy.net (8.12.0.Beta10/8.12.0.Beta10/Debian 8.12.0.Beta10) id f5IL3SD1026158;
	Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:03:28 +0200
Message-Id: <200106182103.f5IL3SD1026158@fog.mors.wiggy.net>
From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: error in auto_ptr implementation
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.18
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.18
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:03:28 +0200
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: g++-3.0
Version: 1:3.0-0pre010613
Severity: normal
Tags: sid

The code below does not compile with g++ 3.0, but it seems correct
judging by my C++ books.

Wichert.

#include <memory>
#include <list>
using namespace std;
int main(int, char**) {
  auto_ptr<int> api(new int(5));
  list<auto_ptr<int> > lapi;
  lapi.push_back(api);

  return 0;
}  

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux fog 2.2.19+ext3+ipsec #1 Thu Apr 12 17:22:37 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.ISO-8859-1

Versions of packages g++-3.0 depends on:
ii  gcc-3.0                 1:3.0-0pre010613 The GNU C compiler.               
ii  gcc-3.0-base            1:3.0-0pre010613 The GNU compiler collection (base 
ii  libc6                   2.2.3-6          GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libstdc++3-dev          1:3.0-0pre010613 The GNU stdc++ library version 3 (


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 101371-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Nov 2001 18:30:49 +0000
>From willy@www.linux.org.uk Wed Nov 28 12:30:49 2001
Return-path: <willy@www.linux.org.uk>
Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk (www.linux.org.uk) [195.92.249.252] (exim)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 1699Tt-0000Yr-00; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 12:30:49 -0600
Received: from willy by www.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 3.33 #5)
	id 1699Ts-0005Qq-00
	for 101371-close@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:30:48 +0000
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:30:48 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: 101371-close@bugs.debian.org
Subject: upstream closed bug
Message-ID: <20011128183048.L3953@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender:  <willy@www.linux.org.uk>
Delivered-To: 101371-close@bugs.debian.org


upstream decided this wasn't a bug, so i'm closing the associated debian bug.

-- 
Revolutions do not require corporate support.



Reply to: