Re: Bug#121282: On i386, gcc-3.0 allows $ in indentifiers but not the asm
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 01:33:25PM -0500, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > As with that bug, no, GCC should complain about dollars starting
> > identifiers. Try using b$c instead of $b.
> Oddly enough, our powerpc gcc packages have --no-dollars-in-identifiers
> enabled by default, despite gas having no problems handling things like
> $b (for the record, alpha, mipseb, and sparc gas also can handle the
> sample code in the bug report without a problem and none of the gcc
> packages on those machines required an explicit
> --dollars-in-identifiers). x86 seems to be the oddball in this regard in
> that gas can't handle cases like $b currently and yet our gcc debs allow
> those cases by default.
> So, my question is, what are the criteria for determining whether or not
> gcc should reject identifiers with dollars? I'm of the opinion that, at
> least for Debian, gas support for that should make that
> determination. After all, if gcc just warns about cases like $b, but gas
> rejects the code, then the warnings are redundant unless they say
> something like "dollar identifier may not be supported by the assembler on
> this target". I still vote for disabling dollared identifiers by default
> on x86 and, now, enabling it on ppc (after proper testing, of course).
You won't be able to build X86 kernels if you do that :) Well, not
with things like NTFS support, at least. I don't know of any other
I'm most strongly of the opinion that this isn't Debian's problem. Our
GCC should support whatever GCC has decided to support.
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer