[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#116484: marked as done (gcj-3.0: gcj executable has no man page)



Your message dated Fri, 26 Oct 2001 00:58:05 +0200
with message-id <15320.39165.490284.131335@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line Bug#116484: gcj-3.0: gcj executable has no man page
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Oct 2001 09:47:23 +0000
>From egonw@sci.kun.nl Sun Oct 21 04:47:23 2001
Return-path: <egonw@sci.kun.nl>
Received: from wn1.sci.kun.nl [131.174.8.1] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15vFCV-0006VM-00; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 04:47:23 -0500
Received: from garak.sci.kun.nl by wn1.sci.kun.nl
	via garak.sci.kun.nl [131.174.9.35] with ESMTP
	id f9L9lEA17142 (8.11.3/3.19); Sun, 21 Oct 2001 11:47:16 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from egonw by garak.sci.kun.nl with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
	id 15vFBp-0000BV-00; Sun, 21 Oct 2001 11:46:41 +0200
From: Egon Willighagen <egonw@sci.kun.nl>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: gcj-3.0: gcj executable has no man page
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.29
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.29
Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2001 11:46:40 +0200
Message-Id: <[🔎] E15vFBp-0000BV-00@garak.sci.kun.nl>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: gcj-3.0
Version: 1:3.0.2-0pre010922
Severity: normal

The gcj executable has no manual page. As is "should"-ed by Debian Policy, section 13.1.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux garak.sci.kun.nl 2.4.9 #6 Sat Sep 22 19:29:03 CEST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=, LC_CTYPE=

Versions of packages gcj-3.0 depends on:
ii  gcc-3.0               1:3.0.2-0pre010922 The GNU C compiler.
ii  gcc-3.0-base          1:3.0.2-0pre010922 The GNU Compiler Collection (base 
ii  java-common           0.7                Base of all Java packages
ii  libc6                 2.2.4-3            GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libgcj2-dev           1:3.0.2-0pre010922 Java development headers and stati
ii  zlib1g                1:1.1.3-15         compression library - runtime


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 116484-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Oct 2001 22:59:52 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Thu Oct 25 17:59:52 2001
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15wtTc-0002Tw-00; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 17:59:52 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (doko@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA18643;
	Fri, 26 Oct 2001 00:58:05 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
	by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f9PMw5Z12271;
	Fri, 26 Oct 2001 00:58:05 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15320.39165.490284.131335@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 00:58:05 +0200
To: Egon Willighagen <egonw@sci.kun.nl>, 116484-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#116484: gcj-3.0: gcj executable has no man page
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E15vFBp-0000BV-00@garak.sci.kun.nl>
References: <[🔎] E15vFBp-0000BV-00@garak.sci.kun.nl>
X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: 116484-done@bugs.debian.org

Egon Willighagen writes:
> Package: gcj-3.0
> Version: 1:3.0.2-0pre010922
> Severity: normal
> 
> The gcj executable has no manual page. As is "should"-ed by Debian Policy, section 13.1.

gcj and gcj-3.0 both do have a man page.



Reply to: