Bug#108881: Wrong package version of libstdc++2.10 in testing and/or unstable?

[Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>]

reassign 108881 ftp.debian.org
thanks

If the glibc2.1 based version of libstdc++2.10 is kept in woody, then
this has to be moved to testing, as a glibc2.1 compile isn't possible
with testing/unstable.

Arndt Schoenewald writes:
 > Package: libstdc++2.10
 > Version: 1:2.95.2-14
 > 
 > We just discovered the fact that the .deb version of this package in
 > woody/testing is 1:2.95.2-14, while both sid/unstable and potato/stable
 > contain 1:2.95.2-13. (Visit e.g.
 > 
 >     http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=libstdc%2B%2B2.10&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
 > 
 > to see for yourself.)
 > 
 > The file name for woody/testing's .deb file is
 > 
 >     dists/woody/main/binary-i386/base/libstdc++2.10_2.95.2-14.deb
 > 
 > (i.e. the package pool is not used yet) which suggests this version went
 > into woody when woody was still unstable and testing did not exist yet.
 > 
 > We came across this inconsistency on a sid/unstable system when we found
 > that libstdc++2.10 was the only package in /var/lib/dpkg/available that
 > did not have a "Filename:" entry (apparently because the system has
 > version 1:2.95.2-14 installed back from its old woody/unstable days,
 > but the only version that is available now is 1:2.95.2-13).
 > 
 > -- 
 > Arndt Schoenewald <arndt@lin02384n012.mc.schoenewald.de>
 > 
 > 
 > -- 
 > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-request@lists.debian.org
 > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org