On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:32:26PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Christopher C. Chimelis writes:
> > On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > > I don't like the current situation. we have a gcc version in woody
> > > that should be removed and version in sid, which doesn't
> > > propagate.
> > What's the hold-up on the sid->woody move for gcc-3.0 (I haven't seen
> > update-excuses yet)? I can't think of any reason to keep the version in
> > woody around at all...
out of date on sparc: cpp-3.0-doc, g77-3.0-doc, gcc-3.0-base,
gcc-3.0-doc, libstdc++3-doc (from 3.0.1.ds0-0pre010721)
Those debs also don't appear to be built anymore? Is that a mistake or should
they be removed too?
Also the i386 debs seem to be out of date (also, the i386 autobuilder
is hung atm).
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you
do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.''
-- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
Attachment:
pgpm7Z_BQL9AI.pgp
Description: PGP signature