On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Matthias Klose wrote: > I don't like the current situation. we have a gcc version in woody > that should be removed and version in sid, which doesn't > propagate. What's the hold-up on the sid->woody move for gcc-3.0 (I haven't seen update-excuses yet)? I can't think of any reason to keep the version in woody around at all... C