[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#101876: marked as done (please change ia64 default to 2.96)



Your message dated Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:14:48 +0200
with message-id <15164.64984.96582.514448@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line fixed in gcc-defaults-0.11
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jun 2001 06:39:26 +0000
>From bdale@gag.com Fri Jun 22 01:39:26 2001
Return-path: <bdale@gag.com>
Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [::ffff:207.217.120.62] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15DKbF-000701-00; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 01:39:25 -0500
Received: from rover.gag.com (sdn-ar-006coauroP085.dialsprint.net [168.191.172.173])
	by snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA06507
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:39:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rover.gag.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 86D683BE98; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:39:04 -0600 (MDT)
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: please change ia64 default to 2.96
Message-Id: <[🔎] 20010622063904.86D683BE98@rover.gag.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:39:04 -0600 (MDT)
From: bdale@gag.com (Bdale Garbee)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: gcc-defaults
Version: 0.8
Severity: serious

Hi.  We are replacing the hackish 'gnupro' toolchain package for ia64 with
properly crafted 2.96 packages as defaults, and 3.0 available as an option.
Please change the gcc-defaults package to use 2.96 as the default for ia64.

I'm making this bug release critical since it needs to be resolved before
woody's release.

Patch from 0.8 to what I'm calling 0.8.1 is attached, which yields 2.96-1
versions for ia64 which will be uploaded.  When you merge the patch, do 
whatever feels right to you for the version suffix... I see no real value in
the REL_NO_30 stuff, but if you want to create a REL_NO_296 we won't mind.

Thanks!

Bdale

diff -u -r gcc-defaults-0.8/debian/changelog gcc-defaults-0.8.1/debian/changelog
--- gcc-defaults-0.8/debian/changelog   Sat May 26 18:26:06 2001
+++ gcc-defaults-0.8.1/debian/changelog Fri Jun 22 00:08:37 2001
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+gcc-defaults (0.8.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * IA-64 currently uses 2.96 as the default and will soon have 3.0 as an
+    option.  Reflect the correct default here, we had assumed 3.0 previously.
+    
+ -- Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>  Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:16:08 -0600
+
 gcc-defaults (0.8) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * Update version number to 2.95.4 (except m68k).
diff -u -r gcc-defaults-0.8/debian/rules gcc-defaults-0.8.1/debian/rules
--- gcc-defaults-0.8/debian/rules       Fri May 11 01:36:16 2001
+++ gcc-defaults-0.8.1/debian/rules     Fri Jun 22 00:04:12 2001
@@ -40,15 +40,15 @@
 endif
 
 ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE),ia64-linux) 
-    CV_CPP     := 3.0-$(REL_NO_30)
-    CV_GCC     := 3.0-$(REL_NO_30)
-    CV_GPP     := 3.0-$(REL_NO_30)
-    CV_GOBJC   := 3.0-$(REL_NO_30)
-    CV_G77     := 3.0-$(REL_NO_30)
-    CV_CHILL   := 3.0-$(REL_NO_30)
-    CV_GCJ     := 3.0-$(REL_NO_30)
-    CV_GPC     := 3.0-$(REL_NO_30)
-    packages   := c++ fortran java objc 
+    CV_CPP     := 2.96-$(REL_NO)
+    CV_GCC     := 2.96-$(REL_NO)
+    CV_GPP     := 2.96-$(REL_NO)
+    CV_GOBJC   := 2.96-$(REL_NO)
+    CV_G77     := 2.96-$(REL_NO)
+    CV_CHILL   := 2.96-$(REL_NO)
+    CV_GCJ     := 2.96-$(REL_NO)
+    CV_GPC     := 2.96-$(REL_NO)
+    packages   := c++ fortran objc 
 endif
 
 ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_GNU_TYPE),i386-linux)


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 101876-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jun 2001 22:18:17 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Fri Jun 29 17:18:17 2001
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [::ffff:130.149.17.13] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15G6ae-000604-00; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:18:17 -0500
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (doko@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA19110;
	Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:14:48 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
	by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id f5TMEmB10692;
	Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:14:48 +0200 (MEST)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15164.64984.96582.514448@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 00:14:48 +0200
To: 102528-done@bugs.debian.org, 101876-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: fixed in gcc-defaults-0.11
X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: 101876-done@bugs.debian.org

fixed in gcc-defaults-0.11.



Reply to: