Re: GCC 3.0 status?

[Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>]

Joey Hess writes:
 > If this does indeed take some time (which sure seems likely), perhaps it
 > would be a good idea to move the existing gcc-3.0 packages from priority
 > standard to priority extra in the meantime. As is, they are selected
 > automatically by dselect, and worse, are being installed as part of all
 > new installs of woody..

they are standard for hppa. I did not want to introduce this
dependency in the package, because then we have to upload a package
each time an architecture changes it's default compiler.