Bug#101069: ld cannot find -lgcc_s

[Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>]

Daniel Jacobowitz writes:
 > On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 02:32:58AM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote:
 > > 
 > > On Fri, 15 Jun 2001, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
 > > 
 > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 09:34:36PM -0700, Evan Prodromou wrote:
 > > > > By the way, there -is- a libgcc_s available:
 > > > > 
 > > > > ---8<---
 > > > > evan priss:~/tmp$ find /usr/lib -name *libgcc_s*
 > > > > /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-linux/3.0/libgcc_s.so
 > > > > ---8<---
 > > > > 
 > > > > Suggestions and/or a fix would be lovely. B-)
 > > > 
 > > > It's a symlink to the wrong thing.  I think this was already
 > > > filed/addressed this morning... the soname changed from .0 to .1 in the
 > > > current snapshots, in prep for release.
 > > 
 > > I'll check, but the GCC_SONAME wasn't modified, which is what the link was
 > > originally based on.  I am currently trying to figure out if we can grep
 > > or awk it out of a file some place rather than hard-coding it in the
 > > rules scripts...
 > 
 > Given the way it's set - I really doubt it.

it's hardcoded in gcc/config/t-slibgcc-elf-ver. At least for 3.0.x
this should be a non-issue :-)

reading the symlink doesn't work, because we need the version number
for the control file as well.