Re: gcc-3.1 for hurd-i386
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 12:44:45AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Considering the "confusion" of having gcc272 as default C compiler
> and egcs as default C++ compiler in slink and the arch by arch
> switch to new compiler versions, I would propose to switch all
> architectures at once, if that's possible. So maybe it's reasonable
> to: upload 3.1 after the woody release, make it the default with the
> gcc-3.1.1 release? Is this too late for the hurd?
Have you come to a decision on what you want to happen for hurd-i386?
Now that unstable doesn't push into Woody anymore, I'd like to file
the bug report to request gcc-defaults to get it updated and need to
know if I should tell them gcc-3.0 or gcc-3.1.
Note that we haven't got a gcc in the archive yet, so if you choose
3.1, we probably won't build 3.0 officially. We don't plan on
uploading gcc-2.95 at this point. If it works better to switch all at
once to 3.1.1 that's fine too.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
--
One of the great things about books is sometimes
there are some fantastic pictures.
-- George W. Bush
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: