[Freedombox-discuss] Rouge Freedomboxes and government intervention
On 11-06-21 at 08:44pm, Charles N Wyble wrote:
> On 06/21/2011 03:33 PM, S?bastien Lerique wrote:
> > On 21/06/11 16:37, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: For what it's worth, I
> > agree 100% with this. "Consumer" is indeed a sensitive/loaded word
> > (and yes the GNU explanation make its point in saying that one's
> > activity on Internet is not only "consuming"), but I think it fits
> > well as a label for that "harmless FreedomBox" usage.
>
>
> How about "everyday casual user" instead of consumer?
Sounds fine to me.
I wanted to get a message across about short-term stable releases vs.
advanced use cases, and am not stubborn about the name of the labels.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20110622/3deff43f/attachment-0001.pgp>
Reply to: