[Freedombox-discuss] distributed DNS
I'm sure the current DNS way is replaceable but maybe it is better to go for
the short/mid term achievable first and have an incremental approach to
freedom. Work within the current constraints and get something out there
that moves people away from the current centralised data stores and moves
the control back to them (social, email...) and then once it works, is out
there and used then start incrementally fixing the rest. I guess a workable
roadmap is needed, there is a high level start on the wiki. I guess what is
needed is to identify the 'low hanging fruit' and go for them first. Figure
out the OS, software and hardware that can be assembled within the next few
months so that the project has a goal and momentum.
On 16 March 2011 17:03, Luka Mar?eti? <paxcoder at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/15/2011 06:51 PM, Bjarni R?nar Einarsson wrote:
> I actually think it is important that users have as much choice as possible
> - the more diversity the ecosystem has, the better. This is not an argument
> against building our own dynamic DNS, so much as an argument FOR making sure
> Freedomboxes are interoperable with the current offerings - commercial,
> community, or otherwise. :-)
> I think by virtue of being a Debian based system, FB automatically will be
> compatible with the traditional/corporate way. FB should now focus on
> creating a *new* way, a way for freedom. Given that, I think (centralized)
> DNS has to be replaced(able).
> Besides, corps tend to take care of themselves. And on a side note: I don't
> count a choice to choose proprietary software over free software a
> "freedom". :-)
> --Luka Mar?eti?
> Freedombox-discuss mailing list
> Freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...