[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#971830: marked as done (fonts-jetbrains-mono: please advertise which scripts are covered)

Your message dated Wed, 12 Mar 2025 10:20:36 +0100
with message-id <5jhnuntej5mafkgn2wzelfaxnrjubxxbikuu4uhtuivxvqztuw@f26scet7547m>
and subject line Re: fonts-jetbrains-mono: please advertise which scripts are covered
has caused the Debian Bug report #971830,
regarding fonts-jetbrains-mono: please advertise which scripts are covered
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
971830: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=971830
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: fonts-jetbrains-mono
Version: 1.0.4-1
Severity: minor

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi,

Long description emphasizes script coverage as notable feature,
yet does not tell _which_ scripts are covered.

The purpose of package long description is to aid a user
unfamiliar with a package to decide if relevant to install,
and most users will likely want to know if their own script is covered
rather than simply "many".

Please therefore consider including in long description which scripts
is covered by fonts-jetbrains-mono.

I can recommend to look at how such information is automated
in the source package fonts-noto.


 - Jonas

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEn+Ppw2aRpp/1PMaELHwxRsGgASEFAl9+4PcACgkQLHwxRsGg
ASHT9w/9GEtD04VQrJm1+mhlG4NR/SE1Sspph18AgdCc2fKQpbXHgDOdya/9XHny
tD5RPqVyMI6/rfjWOLz8jX/75odFO62EXyjIob01x7h4tF+B2oVaELSaunrM3Uf2
R1uIjYIa3utTvfdtL4A7Y+NOPBV0rkm4v5kn70tESOJMiyAq8dWWfDJxNVckw80J
LgHSE6OojwUo6TK9H9byPZSBHEKaxM8kUyQNjfJjbdiWDBTuRgkJcRRVvmznlG/T
j3BCOtxkc2kTd+h4AP/94xSnula2npskZSm+t2kNM9lLpnmGmhVXQWMyWCk16KBh
u31uWMTwRr6LBGFgu5ZajoZugD60dMbUaYM8dQT19xgvlASfxKMl3zVj0iA8q+u+
U4zE/qOkaCoHgZIuMRFCP5Tuli1anaDrtzidK2QipkR3FMAIvSrmPPLL0+AtNe+h
pljXXhtgC5d614rwJcjdP14gsZXE8sXICQIBFVSt3Lk2fwHdpdY7J388D0MeZF+K
UqKi0EAk1R47mYrLysrsUPuqmib5421TylSvsQ9O7jSrlI5emjHcxlhTeNPwOQNm
wtvhSIuOWQx04EIgMAZ65gzCn2gRBpFef6jfNFCwFg2Tap/4DDl3b/ZagKxRJWg7
qBM+pmqgFXAOjm41RQ4cfIuWtp1ZfX/6VLkf8tWOTRHaQrIqrwE=
=x1qr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
This was not discussed for a while and I see no way forward.

Closing.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: