[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1026951: marked as done (Please update fonts-sil-lateef to latest release 2.000)

Your message dated Fri, 27 Jan 2023 21:34:55 +0000
with message-id <E1pLWN5-00GaF3-LK@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1026951: fixed in fonts-sil-lateef 2.000-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1026951,
regarding Please update fonts-sil-lateef to latest release 2.000
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1026951: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1026951
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: fonts-sil-lateef

Hallo,

Please update fonts-sil-lateef to the latest release 2.000:

https://github.com/silnrsi/font-lateef/releases/latest

And please fix the watch file.

Best,
Amr




--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: fonts-sil-lateef
Source-Version: 2.000-1
Done: Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
fonts-sil-lateef, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1026951@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org> (supplier of updated fonts-sil-lateef package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 16:09:43 -0500
Source: fonts-sil-lateef
Architecture: source
Version: 2.000-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force <debian-fonts@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>
Closes: 1026951
Changes:
 fonts-sil-lateef (2.000-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Team upload.
   * New upstream version 2.000. (Closes: #1026951)
   * debian/control: Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.2.
   * debian/upstream/metadata: Added
   * debian/watch: Fix monitoring script.
   * debian/dirs: Dropped, not needed.
Checksums-Sha1:
 7b4ecdad7e6e459fa60871ad16d1bcfda5e2706b 2068 fonts-sil-lateef_2.000-1.dsc
 f0b0ebe7c634fe6b5a19f2a216ed6cfa2f420c4f 2550484 fonts-sil-lateef_2.000.orig.tar.xz
 4e904afb745fe6dc8ac0c8885e8f9bc8d0cd07d5 4940 fonts-sil-lateef_2.000-1.debian.tar.xz
 6ce01da49a3167839b1c69f0d0af4d0f40b650e6 5937 fonts-sil-lateef_2.000-1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 20f33f56c3dc5934921153f18ee4a695c1a5cd5213a2af768432c623e38bbdd5 2068 fonts-sil-lateef_2.000-1.dsc
 2c2f1f1da5aaa3ef9769d80252f3ca1adcb7ad71d63361b670055c3e5b815d3c 2550484 fonts-sil-lateef_2.000.orig.tar.xz
 652f0088052954924193aa3074ab8561906e897f5ce92bf366e4a1bd17da4835 4940 fonts-sil-lateef_2.000-1.debian.tar.xz
 01d703dcc6a569cea34a5bd324f7b474c5d631c9a5a9ca9a307bc1d2e2904c65 5937 fonts-sil-lateef_2.000-1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 560dab9cc9a0092365dffb5457d37efa 2068 fonts optional fonts-sil-lateef_2.000-1.dsc
 65d3adc8ac8b7bf384c2b0e045d20573 2550484 fonts optional fonts-sil-lateef_2.000.orig.tar.xz
 636d8e1d4b554846130dd4c093439556 4940 fonts optional fonts-sil-lateef_2.000-1.debian.tar.xz
 bc7f2ba72d4415e28ad152926122cbb7 5937 fonts optional fonts-sil-lateef_2.000-1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=D0cL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: