[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1021845: marked as done (s050000l.afm lost in transition from gsfonts to fonts-urw-base35)

Your message dated Wed, 19 Oct 2022 20:36:49 +0200
with message-id <81c7ebc0aa9d11ca4c6fe5700edd489082f33963.camel@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1021845: s050000l.afm lost in transition from gsfonts to fonts-urw-base35
has caused the Debian Bug report #1021845,
regarding s050000l.afm lost in transition from gsfonts to fonts-urw-base35
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1021845: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021845
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: fonts-urw-base35
Version: 20200910-4
Severity: normal

Dear maintainer,

during today's Bug Squashing Party I looked at

| #1020205 ("scalable-cyrfonts: FTBFS: cp: cannot stat
| '/usr/share/fonts/type1/gsfonts/s050000l.afm': No such file or
| directory - <https://bugs.debian.org/1020205>)

and identified the problem as follows: This file s050000l.afm was
previously provided by gsfonts package, that package is now transitional
and depends on fonts-urw-base35, but the file is not provided there.

Question: Was this an oversight, or by intention? In the first case,
please update your package so I can fix scalable-cyrfonts. If it's the
latter, can you please provide a transition plan, and mention it in the
upcoming release notes to avoid further surprises.

FWIW, that file is still available via

r-base-core: /usr/lib/R/library/grDevices/afm/s050000l.afm.gz

but it seems a bad design decision to use r-base-core as the source
for the file.

Kind regards,

    Christoph

-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.15.72 (SMP w/8 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages fonts-urw-base35 depends on:
ii  xfonts-utils  1:7.7+6

fonts-urw-base35 recommends no packages.

Versions of packages fonts-urw-base35 suggests:
pn  fonts-freefont-otf | fonts-freefont-ttf  <none>
pn  fonts-texgyre                            <none>

-- no debconf information

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Am Mittwoch, dem 19.10.2022 um 19:05 +0200 schrieb Christoph Biedl:
> > we could
> > close this issue again?
> 
> Certainly.

Thanks!

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
Reply to: