Bug#1020244: fonts-urw-base35: A monospaced font shouldn't have ligatures

To: Markus Hitter <mah@merchantsedition.com>, 1020244@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#1020244: fonts-urw-base35: A monospaced font shouldn't have ligatures
From: fabian@greffrath.com
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2022 08:18:49 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] c0809e8572c031ec1d771b969fc1a2b1@greffrath.com>
Reply-to: fabian@greffrath.com, 1020244@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 166352550027.66548.9216272574521605454.reportbug@lilienthal.jump-ing.de>
References: <[🔎] 166352550027.66548.9216272574521605454.reportbug@lilienthal.jump-ing.de> <[🔎] 166352550027.66548.9216272574521605454.reportbug@lilienthal.jump-ing.de>

Control: forwarded -1https://github.com/ArtifexSoftware/urw-base35-fonts/issues/31

Control: tags -1 confirmed upstream

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#1020244: fonts-urw-base35: A monospaced font shouldn't have ligatures
  - From: fabian@greffrath.com

References:
- Bug#1020244: fonts-urw-base35: A monospaced font shouldn't have ligatures
  - From: Markus Hitter <mah@merchantsedition.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#1020244: fonts-urw-base35: A monospaced font shouldn't have ligatures
Next by Date: Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#1020244: fonts-urw-base35: A monospaced font shouldn't have ligatures
Previous by thread: Bug#1020244: fonts-urw-base35: A monospaced font shouldn't have ligatures
Next by thread: Bug#1020244: fonts-urw-base35: A monospaced font shouldn't have ligatures
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread