Your message dated Sat, 03 Sep 2022 10:56:41 +0200 with message-id <e113ee078bbcebfc735862d9609fe7fe7b2be85d.camel@greffrath.com> and subject line closing again with source package version has caused the Debian Bug report #546469, regarding [CTAN announcements (Jim Hefferon, tug.ctan.org)] URW++ original 35 fonts available under LPPL to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 546469: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=546469 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>,debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: [CTAN announcements (Jim Hefferon, tug.ctan.org)] URW++ original 35 fonts available under LPPL
- From: Juhapekka Tolvanen <juhtolv@iki.fi>
- Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 14:50:09 +0300
- Message-id: <87r5ubawsu.fsf@juhtolv.dyndns.org>
- Reply-to: juhtolv@iki.fi
Package: gsfonts Version: 1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre44-4 Severity: normal See that forwarded message. I do not subscribe to debian-legal, so please Cc: to me. Here is a direct link to message in archives of ctan-ann: https://lists.dante.de/pipermail/ctan-ann/2009-June/003741.html -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (1001, 'testing'), (990, 'stable'), (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (101, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-686 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=fi_FI.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages gsfonts depends on: ii defoma 0.11.10-1 Debian Font Manager -- automatic f gsfonts recommends no packages. gsfonts suggests no packages. -- no debconf information--- Begin Message ---
- To: CTAN announcements <ctan-ann@dante.de>
- Subject: URW++ original 35 fonts available under LPPL
- From: "CTAN announcements \(Jim Hefferon\, tug.ctan.org\)" <ctan-ann@dante.de>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:56:46 -0400
- Message-id: <1246190206.16806.3.camel@alan.mikenet.smcvt.edu>
From: Jerzy B. Ludwichowski Subject: URW++ making original 35 fonts available under LPPL I am forwarding the message below on behalf of Peter Rosenfeld, Managing Director of URW++, who has kindly agreed to make the basic 35 PostScript fonts also available under the LPPL. At his request, I'll be disseminating the information throughout the TeX community. Many thanks to Dr. Rosenfeld! Many thanks are also due to Karl Berry, TUG President, for his unswerving support and advice and Bogus\{}aw Jackowski, lead TeX Gyre developer, for pushing the issue. Best, Jerzy ............................................................... From: Peter Rosenfeld Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:33:29 +0200 Subject: URW++ original 35 fonts available under LPPL To whom it may concern, Many years ago, URW++ Design and Development Inc. released their Type 1 implementations of the basic 35 PostScript fonts under the GNU General Public License and the Aladdin Ghostscript Free Public License. We now additionally release them under the LaTeX Project Public License (http://www.latex-project.org/lppl), either version 1 or (at your option) any later version. Of course, this additional licensing applies to the original URW++ material, not any subsequent changes and additions made by other parties. The original font files are widely available, for instance as part of the Ghostscript 4.00 release, and therefore we are not releasing any new font files. Those interested can replace the license terms in those original files accordingly. Responsibility for ensuring that no material is incorrectly licensed remains with the distributor, as always. We hope this additional licensing will make our fonts even more widely available and usable in the free software community, such as the TeX Gyre Project. Sincerely, Peter Rosenfeld (Managing Director, URW++) _______________________________________________ Ctan-ann mailing list Ctan-ann@dante.de https://lists.dante.de/mailman/listinfo/ctan-ann
--- End Message ----- Juhapekka "naula" Tolvanen * http colon slash slash iki dot fi slash juhtolv "ore wo mitsumeteiru anata sama wa ossharu bakari. kesshite dakiyosete wa kurenai ooki na anata no te. ore no tanjoubi ni wa ai wo kai ataeru. kyou wa kumori nochi ame." Dir en grey
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 694320-done@bugs.debian.org, 694321-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: 549977-done@bugs.debian.org, 546469-done@bugs.debian.org, 294286-done@bugs.debian.org, 97307-done@bugs.debian.org, 449128-done@bugs.debian.org, 272414-done@bugs.debian.org, 207978-done@bugs.debian.org, 266914-done@bugs.debian.org, 191488-done@bugs.debian.org, 155169-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: closing again with source package version
- From: Fabian Greffrath <fabian@greffrath.com>
- Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2022 10:56:41 +0200
- Message-id: <e113ee078bbcebfc735862d9609fe7fe7b2be85d.camel@greffrath.com>
Version: 20200910-2 Once again without the epoch. Does the BTS track source or binary package versions? - FabianAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---