[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#97307: marked as done (gsfonts: gsfonts should 'Provide:' itself under the former name "gsfonts-x11")



Your message dated Fri, 02 Sep 2022 17:47:09 +0200
with message-id <94804e13f778fea3c7178504893c43fcc2fb5e6d.camel@debian.org>
and subject line Re: gsfonts: gsfonts should 'Provide:' itself under the former name "gsfonts-x11"
has caused the Debian Bug report #97307,
regarding gsfonts: gsfonts should 'Provide:' itself under the former name "gsfonts-x11"
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
97307: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=97307
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gsfonts
Version: 6.0-2
Severity: normal

Hello Thorsten,
I bugreport as you wish:
Please make the renamed gsfonts package provide "gsfonts-x11". Some
packages, e.g. j2sdk1.3 depend strongly on the (old named) package and
would be deinstalled otherwise.

Thanks,
Eduard.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux zombie 2.4.4 #3 Tue May 1 11:40:12 CEST 2001 i686 unknown

Versions of the packages gsfonts depends on:
ii  defoma         0.4.3          Debian Font Manager -- automatic font config



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Version: 2:20200910-2

The gsfonts package has been replaced by fonts-urw-base35.

The gsfonts-x11 package has been integrated into this package.

 - Fabian

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=/yuh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply to: