Hello, On Mon 16 Nov 2020 at 10:42AM -07, Bobby de Vos wrote: > On 2020-11-12 1:10 p.m., Sean Whitton wrote: >> >> +----------------------+ >> | REJECT reasoning | >> +----------------------+ >> >> There is no indication that OFL-FAQ.txt is DFSG-free. > I don't understand. The copyright file includes a Files: * statement > that specifies OFL-1.1. I would have thought that would specify the > license for OFL-FAQ.txt file. Right, but there is no indication that it is actually under that license. OFL is used for fonts not text files. > I realize now that the license should have been OFL-1.1-RFN instead of > OFL-1.1. Would this change address the issue? I'm not familiar with OFL-1.1-RFN. Please explain some more. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature