Bug#971611: fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact: upgrade to version 5.000-3 fails trying to overwrite directory
Package: fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact
Version: 5.000-2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: bpaterni@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer,
fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact came up for upgrade to version 5.000-3 this
evening, but it failed with the following output:
Preparing to unpack .../fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact_5.000-3_all.deb ...
Unpacking fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact (5.000-3) over (5.000-2) ...
dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/fonts-sil-gentiumplus-
compact_5.000-3_all.deb (--unpack):
trying to overwrite '/usr/share/doc-base/fonts-sil-gentiumplus-features',
which is also in package fonts-sil-gentiumplus 5.000-2
dpkg-deb: error: paste subprocess was killed by signal (Broken pipe)
-- Package-specific info:
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Architecture Description
+++-==================-=============-============-=====================================================
ii fontconfig 2.13.1-4.2 amd64 generic font configuration library - support binaries
ii libfreetype6:amd64 2.10.2+dfsg-3 amd64 FreeType 2 font engine, shared library files
ii libfreetype6:i386 2.10.2+dfsg-3 i386 FreeType 2 font engine, shared library files
ii libxft2:amd64 2.3.2-2 amd64 FreeType-based font drawing library for X
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bullseye/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 5.8.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/24 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact depends on:
ii fontconfig 2.13.1-4.2
fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact recommends no packages.
fonts-sil-gentiumplus-compact suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Reply to: