Bug#929128: fonts-noto-cjk: not recognized by lualatex until mktexlsr
Am 26.05.2019 um 03:52 teilte Ryutaroh Matsumoto mit:
Matsumoto-san,
I followed your instructions and tried to reproduce some kind of issue.
I compiled your document using TL from experimental; it triggered some
kind of memory leak in luatex. At least I would not expect that luatex
needs 1,5 GB of RAM to compile your document:
%Cpu(s): 1.3 us, 47.8 sy, 0.3 ni, 0.0 id, 50.5 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si,
0.0 st
MiB Mem : 938.3 total, 59.5 free, 860.5 used, 18.3 buff/cache
MiB Swap: 1376.6 total, 295.4 free, 1081.2 used. 21.0 avail Mem
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+
COMMAND
137 root 0 -20 0 0 0 I 32.2 0.0 0:11.56
kworker/0+
5014 root 20 0 1533540 669688 168 D 8.3 69.7 1:13.58
lualatex
Please file a bug against our package texlive-binaries, version
2019.20190507.51032-1 .
Many thanks!
Hilmar
Matsumoto-san, I am actually surprised that mktexlsr call fixed it,
since luatex doesn't use ls-R files.
Do you have a way to reproduce this behaviour?
You are right. The way to reproduce this issue (not related to mktexlsr)
is
(1) Install texlive-full and fonts-noto-cjk from experimental.
(2) Run lualatex with the below LaTeX source and have error
"Package fontspec Error: The font "NotoSerifCJKJPLight" cannot be found."
(3) Installation of fonts-noto-cjk-extra fixes the issue even though
no font from
fonts-noto-cjk-extra is used. XeLaTeX (with \usepackage[noto]{zxjafont}) and
uplatex (with \usepackage[unicode,noto-otc]{pxchfon}) produce the desired
PDF without fonts-noto-cjk-extra.
\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{ltjsarticle}
\usepackage[noto-otf]{luatexja-preset}
\begin{document}
日本語
\end{document}
This seems a feature or a bug in TeXLive 2019 upstream, which should not have
been filed in BTS. So I close this issue.
--
#206401 http://counter.li.org
Reply to: